Despite series win, batting continues to be major concern for Bangladesh

Their top seven produced their worst combined performance in 11 years, averaging just 18.95 for the series

Mohammad Isam10-Dec-2022Bangladesh’s ODI series win against India will remain an outlier. Their No. 8 batter bailed them out twice with two unbelievable knocks, while their bowlers made decent contributions. But otherwise they won 2-1 despite their top seven batters producing their worst combined performance in 11 years. They have never won an ODI series batting this poorly. Bangladesh’s previous lowest top seven batting average in a series win was 31.07, a full 12 points more than this series’ 18.95.A typical ODI side has six specialist batters but for the better part of the last 15 years, Bangladesh have stretched their line-up to include seven, and sometimes eight, specialist batters. They could do so because of the presence of allrounders such as Shakib Al Hasan and Mahmudullah. In this series, it was their fourth allrounder, Mehidy Hasan Miraz, who played two critical knocks. Among the specialist batters, only Mahmudullah’s 77 in the second game was worth a mention.Captain Litton Das got three starts but didn’t capitalise on any of them. He looked good in Chattogram too, but dinked Mohammed Siraj to mid-off when he was on 29. Shakib stuck around for 43 but never looked like settling down for the long haul. In the end, Bangladesh’s top seven faded away by the 28th over of the chase.Related

'Nothing wrong with our ability but we need to be more gritty' – Rangana Herath

Kishan 210, Kohli 113; India 409, Bangladesh 182

Mushfiqur and Taskin return for first Test against India

Apart from Litton, Bangladesh’s top three haven’t really provided a foundation or protection to the middle order. Najmul Hossain Shanto scored two fifties during the T20 World Cup in Australia but has an ODI batting average of 14 after 15 games.Anamul Haque’s tally of 33 runs is his joint-lowest for an ODI series where he played at least three games. This was his second series after he returned to the 50-over side following a gap of three years. Although he struck two fifties against Zimbabwe in August, the knives could once again be out for him.”Everyone likes to score runs,” Litton said in defence of his players. “What Miraz did, if a top-order batter had done that, we would have had an easier time. [But] I am not worried about it. Both games in Mirpur had different scenarios. We batted second today, but if it was a 300-350 game, it would have been a different ball game.”I don’t think there should be a concern. India’s batting collapsed too. The wicket was behaving in that way. It was a big chase today so there was no point trying for 300-320. We wanted to bat to win, but our attacking cricket didn’t work. Next time we face this situation, we will play the same type of attacking cricket.”

“Today, it was a good batting wicket, but we couldn’t cope with the run rate pressure. There’s a lot to learn from this type of game. We have the skill to chase down 300 runs”Litton Das

But it is hard to deny that most of the top seven failed in this series. Afif Hossain made the fewest runs among the top seven, finishing with just 14 from three innings. Still, the main focus will be on Mushfiqur Rahim.In an ODI series where he has batted in the top five at least three times, Mushfiqur’s 37 runs here is his lowest aggregate since 2011. He has failed to total 100 runs in four series in a row now, having tallied 77 against Zimbabwe and 96 against Afghanistan. In between, he had 20 runs from two innings against South Africa. These series, though, came after his best bilateral outing, when he made 237 runs at 79 against Sri Lanka last year.Mushfiqur’s retirement from T20Is after the Asia Cup could have been an indication that his powers are on the wane. He has done reasonably well in Tests this year, but a string of low-scoring ODI series is far from an ideal situation. Bangladesh have work to do and Litton knows it.”We are not the best team in the world,” he said. “So we can work on these factors: top-order batting, bowling, and fielding. My dropped catch [of Virat Kohli when he was on 1 on Saturday] was costly. I know this type of catch is expected of me. If I had held on to the catch, they would have been under a bit more pressure. [But] the improvement will only come through a lot of practice.”Batting in Tests hasn’t been easy either. Apart from the first Test this year, which they famously won against New Zealand, they have mostly struggled for consistency. After winning the ODI series in South Africa, their bowling prospered in the Test series but their batting didn’t come to the party. The same happened at home against Sri Lanka, and away in the West Indies.It was largely because of their No. 8 batter Mehidy Hasan Miraz that Bangladesh won the series•Associated PressIt could be a similar story for the upcoming Tests against India. Mominul Haque and Mahmudul Hasan Joy struggled for runs during the domestic season, while Shanto has scored just one fifty in eight Tests this year. A lot will rest on Shakib, Mushfiqur and Litton, out of whom Mushfiqur will be under considerable pressure once again.Many believe that Bangladesh’s biggest disadvantage is that they play most of their home games at the Shere Bangla National Stadium, where the pitches are either raging turners in Tests or slow decks with a bit of uneven bounce in white-ball cricket. Chattogram offers them the best bet of playing in conditions similar to those on offer at next year’s ODI World Cup in India. Litton said that they will learn more about setting up 300-plus totals or chasing them down in the coming months, but didn’t say anything about playing more matches in Chattogram.”We didn’t play entirely bad cricket in Mirpur. It is true that the pitch wasn’t playing even. Today, it was a good batting wicket, but we couldn’t cope with the run rate pressure.”There’s a lot to learn from this type of game. We have the skill to chase down 300 runs. India’s wickets and outfields are good, which was the case today. I think if we play more regularly, we will get into this groove.”Litton, however, said that it was a proud moment to win his first series as captain. “I am quite happy at the way everyone helped me. I never felt pressure in the field. As a first-time captain, there’s nothing better than winning a series. It would have been better had we won today as well, but it wasn’t bad.”When I did the first press conference, I had the belief in my team. Someone asked if I wanted the trophy, and I said, ‘Yes, definitely.’ As a captain and a player, it is quite natural to want to win such a big series. There’s nothing bigger than a series win.”There’s merit in allowing batters to play on pitches like Chattogram, so that they can get their mojo back, which many believe has been lost since 2016 when the team management first decided to go for raging turners in almost all formats. But the current team management also has to weigh their options – whether to give batters a bit of security, or get wins under their belt. The good thing perhaps is that the series win will give them confidence, and allow them to think proactively about the floundering batters.

IPL 2021 Part 1: Samson's refused single, Jadeja's 37-run over, Brar's golden scalps

With the IPL set to resume, we look back at five defining moments from the first chunk of the season

Hemant Brar14-Sep-2021Samson refuses a single
Chasing 222 against Punjab Kings, Sanju Samson scored 119 scintillating runs but it was the single he did not take that remains the abiding memory of his innings. With Rajasthan Royals needing 13 from the last over, Arshdeep Singh conceded only two singles from the first three balls. Samson hit the fourth ball for a six to make it five required from two balls, and then drilled the penultimate ball towards long-off. Non-striker Chris Morris, no slouch with bat, charged halfway down the pitch before realising Samson wasn’t interested in the run.That meant Royals needed five off the final ball. Arshdeep bowled it full outside off, almost in the slot but Samson could only slice it into the hands of deep cover.Related

  • IPL returns to UAE as familiar foes Mumbai Indians and Chennai Super Kings take centre stage

  • IPL 2021 returns: Rajasthan Royals, Punjab Kings, KKR and Sunrisers Hyderabad look to turn fortunes around

  • Brendon McCullum: 'We were being paralysed a little bit by fear' at the start of IPL 2021

  • The ever evolving genius of Kieron Pollard

  • Jadeja is already changing games – in 3D

Jadeja tears apart Harshal
In his first four games in IPL 2021, Harshal Patel had bowled seven overs at the death at an economy rate of 5.85 while picking up nine wickets. Then came the game against Chennai Super Kings. Harshal bowled the 18th over of the innings, conceded only five runs and dismissed Ambati Rayudu. His figures at that stage were 3-0-14-3. Giving him the 20th over was a no-brainer.Ravindra Jadeja, though, had other plans. Harshal tried offcutters, yorkers and a slower bouncer but nothing came out right as Jadeja stood deep in his crease, cleared the front leg and launched everything over midwicket. The first four balls, including a no-ball, were all hit for sixes. The next produced a brace before Jadeja finished it off with another six and a four, making it the joint-most expensive over (37 runs) in the IPL.Shaw’s six fours in an over
While Jadeja’s onslaught against Harshal came in the last over of the innings with the batter well set, Prithvi Shaw did something similar to Shivam Mavi in the first over itself.Kolkata Knight Riders had set Capitals a target of 155. Not a daunting task but Shaw reduced it to a cakewalk just after one over. Mavi’s first ball was a wide down the leg side; each of the next six was dispatched for a four via an array of shots – loft, flick, punch, drive and cut. Shaw didn’t premeditate. All he did was reacted to the ball and hit it either in the gaps or over the infield. He and Dhawan added 132 for the first wicket as Capitals cruised home with seven wickets and 21 balls to spare.Kieron Pollard hammered a 17-ball half-century to pull off an improbable heist against Chennai Super Kings•BCCI/IPLBrar gets Kohli, Maxwell and de Villiers
Halfway into his third IPL season, Harpreet Brar had no wicket to his name. And then, in a single match against Royal Challengers Bangalore, he dismissed Virat Kohli, Glenn Maxwell and AB de Villiers. All in a span of seven balls. Without conceding a run.In Brar’s earlier overs, Kohli had hit his first balls for a six and a four. At the start of his third over, Kohli once again stepped out but this time Brar shortened his length and castled him. On the next ball, he beat Maxwell’s outside edge to hit the off stump. de Villiers prevented the hat-trick but with the first ball of his next over, Brar snared him as well, caught at extra cover by KL Rahul. That all but sealed Kings’ victory.Pollard stuns Chennai Super Kings
Set a target of 219, Mumbai Indians were 81 for 3 in the tenth over when Kieron Pollard came to the crease. The asking rate was already above 13 and soon crossed 15. That’s when Pollard started the boundary-fest. He bludgeoned Jadeja for three sixes in an over and Lungi Ngidi for two before meting out similar treatment to Shardul Thakur.Still, Mumbai needed 16 from the last over, bowled by Ngidi. With Dhawal Kulkarni at the other end, Pollard decided to face all six deliveries. He refused singles on the first and fourth balls while squeezing out two fours in between. With eight needed from two, Ngidi bowled a juicy full toss that Pollard pulled for six. Then he dug out the final ball towards wide mid-on and sprinted back for the second to seal the match and finish unbeaten on 87 off 34 balls.

Smart Stats MVPs – Old is gold as Rahane, du Plessis, Chawla lead the way

Halfway into IPL 2023, ESPNcricinfo Identifies the best performers after factoring in the context and match situation

S Rajesh26-Apr-2023T20 was originally meant to be a young man’s game, but one would scoff at that notion seeing the top performers of IPL 2023. The leading run-scorer is Faf du Plessis, who’ll turn 39 in July; the third-highest score this season is the unbeaten 99 from Shikhar Dhawan, who is 37; with a 30-ball cut-off, the batter with the highest strike rate (199.04) is Ajinkya Rahane, who’ll turn 35 in June; the leading wicket-taker for Mumbai Indians is 34-year-old Piyush Chawla.All of these players are among the top seven in terms of the top impact players at the halfway stage this season, according to ESPNcricinfo’s Smart Stats, a performance rating system which takes into account the context and match situation for each batting and bowling display.ESPNcricinfo LtdWith 405 runs at a strike rate of 165.3, there is no doubt that du Plessis has been the stand-out batter of the tournament. He is also at the top of the MVP list, collecting 71.2 impact points per match. Each of his five 50-plus scores got more than 75 impact points, which is an illustration not just of consistent run-scoring, but also of maintaining a terrific strike rate.Dhawan has unfortunately missed three games due to injury, but his unbeaten 99 off 66 is arguably the top batting performance of the tournament, especially since it came out of a total of 143, and the other batters collectively scored 38 off 54. That is reflected in his impact score of 161.05 for that innings, the highest impact points for any player in a match this season. It’s marginally higher than Venkatesh Iyer’s 51-ball 104 in a relatively high-scoring game against Mumbai Indians.

If du Plessis is the stand-out batter so far, then his team-mate Mohammed Siraj has that honour among bowlers, according to Smart Stats. He is joint second on the highest wicket-takers’ list with 13, one behind Rashid Khan’s 14, but the algorithm reckons those 13 scalps are worth 18.3 Smart Wickets, compared to Rashid’s 16.8. That’s because of the number of top-order wickets Siraj has taken – he has seven in the Powerplays, which is joint highest with Trent Boult. Those breakthroughs have often set the tone for the innings to give Royal Challengers Bangalore early ascendancy.The two huge surprises in that list, though, are clearly Rahane and Chawla. Of the five innings Rahane has played so far, four have been 30-plus runs at 160-plus strike rates; two of those have been 60-plus runs at 200-plus strike rates. Rahane’s current impact per innings of 55.99 is easily the best of his IPL career. In fact, only once before has his impact exceeded 35 – in 2015, when he scored 540 runs at a strike rate of 130.8. Most of his IPL career, his impact per innings has hovered in the 20s, which is about half of what he is going at this season.ESPNcricinfo LtdSimilarly, Chawla’s resurgence has been remarkable. In the last three IPL seasons that he played (2019 to 2021), he took 17 wickets in 21 games at an average of 36.9 and an economy rate of 9.04. This season, his 11 wickets have come at 17.45, and an economy rate of 7.11.Teams and their Impact PointsChennai Super Kings and Gujarat Titans are topping the points table halfway into the season, but how do the teams stack up in terms of Impact Points in the tournament so far? The table below lists the batting and bowling Impact Points for each team, and apart from Royal Challengers sneaking into the top position, it quite closely resembles the points table. Super Kings and Titans are second and third. The other teams on eight are all bunched together, as are the bottom-runners on four.

Royal Challengers topping the list is largely because they have taken the most wickets among all teams – 54, one more than Titans and three more than Super Kings – and they also have the second-best run rate (9.41) after Super Kings (9.68). They have also been involved in a few close finishes: those add to the impact points because of the high pressure on both batters and bowlers. Of the 2471 points they have earned, 39% has been contributed by two players – du Plessis and Siraj.What also stands out is the poor batting numbers for Delhi Capitals and Sunrisers Hyderabad. They are languishing at the bottom in terms of run rates too – 7.83 for Sunrisers and 7.49 for Capitals – while the 60 wickets lost by Capitals are the most by any team. Sunrisers are also at the bottom of the bowling impact points, which illustrates what a fall it has been for a team which used to pride itself on its bowling – apart from Mayank Markande and Bhuvneshwar Kumar, none of the others have had an impressive tournament so far.

Bangladesh bungle with match-ups obsession

It was a reminder that match-ups are something more than rightie/leftie, in-spin and out-spin

Matt Roller24-Oct-20213:37

Nafees: Dropped chances proved costly for Bangladesh

The terminology is in vogue but the principle is not. The phrase ‘match-ups’ had started to seep into T20 phraseology by the end of the 2016 T20 World Cup. See England’s decision to bowl Joe Root’s offbreaks to Chris Gayle in the final as evidence. However, since then, it has become ubiquitous.The question is simple: which bowler is best used against each batter? T20’s brevity heightens the importance of each such decision, and the evolution and acceptance of data analysis means that more time is spent planning for opponents than ever before.”It plays a huge role,” Kieron Pollard, West Indies’ captain, said last week, “and tactically it works more often than not.”

Watch the T20 WC on ESPN+

Sign up for ESPN+ and catch the Men’s T20 World Cup live in the US. Match highlights of Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka are available here in English, and here in Hindi.

The most common match-ups are the most obvious. “Since the dawn of spin bowling, the obvious strategy has been to turn the ball away from the batsman,” Scyld Berry, the ‘s chief cricket writer, has written. The logic is straightforward: turning the ball away from the bat makes it harder for batters to hit boundaries over the leg side, because you are taking the ball away from their hitting arc.In general terms, those match-ups work. Across T20I cricket, left-arm orthodox spinners concede fewer runs per over against right-handed batters than right-lefties, while offspinners are comparatively cheaper against lefties. Perhaps unsurprisingly, they become a captain’s go-to.But in Sharjah on Sunday, in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh’s opening Super 12s game, the deficiency of that basic strategy was exposed by batters set on taking their opponents’ weak links down.It started in the seventh over of Bangladesh’s innings – on average, the second lowest-scoring over of any given T20 innings after the first, when batters look to consolidate after the fielding restrictions are lifted. With that in mind, and with two left-handers at the crease in Mohammad Naim and Shakib Al Hasan, Sri Lanka’s captain Dasun Shanaka looked to squeeze in an over of his part-time offspinner, Charith Asalanka.Bangladesh saw an opportunity to target Asalanka and seized on it. Defending a short off-side boundary – some 16 metres shorter than the leg-side one – two of his first three balls were too wide outside off stump and duly smashed away for four. The sixth was straighter, but short enough for Shakib to give himself room outside leg stump and slash a cut for four. The over cost 14, and gave Bangladesh a boost straight after a relatively subdued Powerplay.Charith Asalanka’s blinder saw Sri Lanka home•ICC via GettyAsalanka was involved again, this time with the bat, to expose Bangladesh’s strategy. Shakib struck twice in his second over, the ninth of the innings, to leave Sri Lanka 72 for 3. That quickly became 79 for 4 when Wanindu Hasaranga holed out to deep midwicket. That left Asalanka and Bhanuka Rajapaksa – both left-handers – together, and Mahmudullah immediately threw the ball to his primary offspinner, Mahedi Hasan.Mahedi’s first over cost five runs as Sri Lanka consolidated, and Mahmudullah saw a chance to bring himself on, again to turn the ball away from the left-handers’ outside edge. He conceded five singles as the required rate climbed above 10 runs per over: with Shakib, Mustafizur Rahman and Mohammad Saifuddin able to bowl seven of the final eight overs between them, he only needed to find one more between his weaker bowlers.But Mahmudullah gambled on another offspin/leftie match-up, bringing on Afif Hossain. Afif has occasionally been a handy part-timer in his career to date but has been used only sporadically: even with the match-up seemingly in his favour, it was a brave call to back him ahead of the left-arm spin of Nasun Ahmed, a frontline spinner who had knocked out the off stump of Kusal Perera – a left-hander – in the first over of the chase.Rajapaksa saw a chance to target a young, inexperienced bowler and pounced, skipping down the pitch and lofting his first ball inside-out over extra cover for six. It was a brave decision, but with extra cover inside the circle and a short boundary to aim for, his 66-metre mishit was enough to clear the rope. Two balls later, he mistimed a sweep towards the long boundary; Liton Das, at deep backward square, dropped a simple catch.The over cost 15 runs but meant that Mahmudullah could rely on his main three bowlers for the last seven, but after a tight first over, he continued to obsess about spinning the ball away from the bat. Mahmudullah kept himself on, and just as Shakib had done to the Sri Lankan earlier, Asalanka targeted him: he shimmied down to loft a straight six into the VIP seats, then mistimed a slog-sweep over the short side. The last two overs of part-time offspin cost 31, and suddenly, Sri Lanka were ahead of the required rate.”It was a tactical decision, decided by the team management,” Mushfiqur Rahim said afterwards, defending the move. “We don’t believe, for example, that left-arm spinners can’t bowl against left-handed batters. In today’s game, the bowler created one opportunity. If it was taken, a right-handed batter would have come, and he would become more impactful.”I think it is not fair to have an opinion on something just seeing the outcome. It is important to see whether the right bowler is bowling at the right time. The ground was small at one end, so bringing the left-arm spinner from that end would have been risky. Our captain and team management took the right decision.” It was a bold defence of a call that cost them the game and left them struggling to make the semi-finals after only their first Super 12s game.The lesson within is not that match-ups are ineffective: analysts rightly spend hours dissecting opposition batters, looking for any slight weaknesses and working out how to exploit them. More often than not, that planning pays dividends, but could Mahmudullah really be sure that offspin was the right option for Asalanka – playing only his fifth T20I – or Rajapaksa, who is dismissed regularly but scores quickly against it?Instead, this game was a reminder that match-ups are something more than rightie/leftie, in-spin and out-spin. When captains are on autopilot, making decisions without considering their remaining resources, the boundary dimensions and the flow of the game, batters can capitalise regardless the direction of turn.Stripped back to their most basic level, match-ups are about which bowler is best used against each batter; more often than not, the one who bowls for a living rather than as a part-timer will be a better option

Were the pitches tougher to bat on in the 2023 India-Australia series or the 2017 one? Here's what the data says

Looking at pitching lines and lengths for offspinners against right-hand batters tells a story

Kartikeya Date13-Apr-2023Australia toured India for four Tests each in 2017 and 2023 and lost 1-2 both times. On its website, the BCCI publishes scorecards and ball-tracking records for each ball of these series (and others). Readers can look up any ball in a recent Test, ODI, T20I or IPL match played in India, one at a time.Related

Why you can't counter good spin bowling by just sweeping

This is the way: Going around the wicket to take buckets of wickets

Is the ICC's pitch-rating system fit for purpose?

These records make available the pitching point (line and length of the delivery), interception point (the point at which the ball hit the bat, pad or a part of the batter’s body, if at all), and the beehive point (the point at which the ball would have crossed, or did cross, the plane of the stumps). Additionally, the ball-tracking record provides measures of turn, seam movement and speed, among others. This is a treasure trove of information made available by the BCCI.ESPNcricinfo records a control measurement for each delivery. This is an answer (either yes or no) to the question “Did the ball end up where the batter intended?” This article uses these two types of records – ball-tracking and control – to describe the contest between offspinners and right-hand batters in the 2017 and 2023 series.Kartikeya DatePitch maps showing the pitching points and interception points for balls bowled by offspinners to right-hand batters in the two series are in the graphs above and below.Kartikeya DateFirst impressions suggest that the line of attack was straighter in 2023, mostly because the offspinners bowled around the wicket to right-handers most of the time. These distinctions are also shown in the table below. (This table includes all deliveries by offspinners to right-hand batters in these two series for which complete ball-tracking records (pitching, interception, beehive) are available. Records are not complete for 103 balls in the 2017 series and 36 balls in the 2023 series; 15 false shots and one dismissal in 2017 and six false shots and 0 dismissals in 2023 are consequently missed in this record.)

The effect of the change from over-the-wicket (predominant in 2017) to round the wicket (predominant in 2023) is evident most clearly in comparing balls of type B (not hitting the stumps, intercepted in line), and balls of type C (hitting the stumps, intercepted outside the line). While the frequency of false shots against type B was nearly double that of type C in both series, the conversion of false shots to dismissals was reversed. In 2017, getting outside the line meant safety for the right-hander against the offspinner. In 2023, it didn’t.The eight pitches did not offer assistance to the spinners and seamers equally. The characteristics of each pitch, as rendered by the control figures, are in the tables below. Pitches offered different degrees of turn, bounce, and variability in bounce.

The pitch in Indore was the most difficult of those in the two series because it offered generally low bounce that was highly uneven. By comparison, the Bengaluru pitch from 2017 also offered significant variable bounce to the fingerspinners, but the ball generally bounced more there. The Bengaluru pitch was probably not easier to bat on compared to the Indore one, but it was easier for the spinner to threaten the stumps in Indore. Nathan Lyon’s eight-wicket haul in the first innings in Bengaluru included six caught dismissals. His eight-wicket haul in Indore included six bowled or leg-before-wicket dismissals.

The tables suggest that five – Pune, Bangalore, Nagpur, Indore and Delhi – of the eight pitches could be considered spin-friendly and the other three might be considered less so, with reliable bounce and moderate turn. Batters managed a false shot once every 5.7 balls or better against fingerspin in these three Tests.Kartikeya DateThe graphs above and below show the interception points for right-hand batters facing offspinners in the 2017 and 2023 Border Gavaskar Trophy Tests. The one above shows the distribution of false shot rates according to interception points in Dharamsala, Ranchi and Ahmedabad. The second graph below shows the same for Pune, Bangalore, Nagpur, Delhi and Indore. The batting crease in the graphs is at 1.2m and the stumps are at 0.0m.Kartikeya DateFor the most part, batters try to play forward (they meet the ball at at least 2.3m from the stumps), or back. These are also the interception points at which the batter is most assured.On the flat pitches, as long as the batter read the length against the offspinner and got forward or back, the jeopardy was minimal (false shots occur at a rate of between one in 20 balls and one in ten balls). But when the batter was beaten in the flight, the jeopardy increased (false shots occur at a rate of between one in seven balls and one in four balls). This is probably what players are describing when they say that they can “trust the pitch”; the spinner has to beat the bat in the air in these cases.On the turning pitches, batters were beaten not just in the air but also off the pitch. So even when the batter met the ball with a full forward stroke, or playing well back, the jeopardy hovered above a rate of one false shot every eight balls (about 12%), and climbed to one every three balls or so when the batter was beaten in the air as well. Batting becomes significantly more difficult on pitches of this sort.At this point, it is worth wondering whether a batter’s judgement of length is affected by the behaviour of the pitch. In other words, does the fact that the batter cannot trust the pitch affect judgement of length?Distribution of lengths of deliveries by off spinners to right hand batters on the three flat pitches.•Kartikeya DateThe graphs above and below show the range of lengths by interception points on the turners and the flat pitches in the India-Australia series. Consider that all the deliveries from an offspinner that the right-hand batter intercepts at a distance of two metres from the stumps are arranged from the fullest to the shortest delivery. This range of lengths is described in the graphs using three values – the median length, the length of the delivery at the 10th percentile in the list, and the length of the delivery in the 90th percentile in the list. For instance, for interception point 0.8 in the graphic above, 50% of the balls were around five metres or fuller, 10% were 4.3m or fuller, and 90% were 7.4m or fuller.Distribution of lengths of deliveries by off spinners to right hand batters on the five turning pitches.•Kartikeya DateAs readers will probably expect, the range of lengths to which the batter plays well forward or back is narrower than the range of lengths for which the batter is caught in between. But there is no discernible difference in the distribution of lengths to which batters play forward or back based on the amount of assistance offered by the pitch. The record does not support the idea that a turning pitch disrupts the batter’s judgment of length. It does make pretty much all lengths more difficult to play. If anything, there is some evidence going the other way – that batters are able to, and do, take more liberties with the length on flatter pitches compared to turners.By bowling around the wicket, offspinners in the 2023 series were able to overpitch less often – their average length was 4.84m, 8.2 inches shorter than in 2017. They were also able to attack the stumps more, and give the right-hand batter fewer scoring opportunities through the off side compared to 2017. On the whole, judging by the false-shot frequency, the pitches in 2017 were probably marginally more difficult to bat on than the pitches in 2023. But in 2023, both sides had deeper spin attacks than in 2017, and both sides fielded five bowlers when they could (Australia did as soon as Cameron Green became available). Consequently, the scores were lower.As illustrated in this article through a discussion of offspin bowling against right-hand batters, the ball-by-ball record, combined with control, provides a picture of the contest between bat and ball that is not available from the traditional scorecard. The scorecard directs our attention to dismissals. Consequently a lot of analysis and discussion in cricket is focused on deliveries which result in dismissals. Largely these deliveries just happen to be ones on which dismissals occur; they could just as likely have occurred on several other deliveries. A genuinely comparative picture of the two contesting teams in a cricket match would consider which team threatened dismissal more persistently than the other in the field. This type of discussion is only possible with data.International teams already use a far more elaborate record of each delivery while preparing for matches, and often with live data feeds during matches. Some basic portion of this data should be published by cricket boards in the public domain. It will be welcomed by fans, and it will enable a textured reading of the skilled labour of batting and bowling rather than the headline outcomes provided in traditional scorecards.The interception distance from the stumps has been calculated by Himanish Ganjoo. I’m grateful for his help

How Mumbai Indians stalled Chennai Super Kings' juggernaut

Suryakumar Yadav’s anchoring knock, Jason Behrendorff’s new-ball burst and Hardik’s all-round show broke Super Kings’ unbeaten three-match streak

Annesha Ghosh in Mumbai04-Apr-2019Five in a flurryFor all the criticism he might have copped for slowing down in the middle overs, the first five fours in Suryakumar Yadav’s 43-ball 59 were key to changing the complexion of Mumbai Indians’ Powerplay. Pegged back by Quinton de Kock’s early departure, the first three overs yielded only nine runs for the hosts. But they scored 31 off the next three, the turnaround beginning in the fourth over with Suryakumar carting Shardul Thakur for back-to-back fours.In the following over, he hammered Deepak Chahar, who had not conceded more than one four in an over in the combined 13 overs he had bowled up to that point, for three consecutive fours. A blend of timing and technique, the medley of boundaries off Deepak included an exquisite punch on the up, a straight drive past mid-on, and a crisp flick behind midwicket – all off back-of-a-length deliveries.While Suryakumar slowed down in the middle overs, his 62-run fourth-wicket stand with Krunal Pandya lifted Mumbai from 50 for 3 to set them up for a final burst.Hardik Pandya and Kieron Pollard added 45 runs in the last two overs•BCCIHardik rises as Suryakumar fallsWith Mumbai on 125 for 5 in 18 overs after Suryakumar’s dismissal, Hardik, who had faced only two deliveries till that point, had little choice but to go big. And big did he go, scoring 24 off the next six balls he faced that included three sixes and a four.Hardik’s fireworks lent credence to Super Kings head coach Stephen Fleming’s assessment that “if you can keep him out of the game, you often go close to winning.”The start of the 19th over of Mumbai’s innings dented that possibility for Super Kings to a large degree. With Kieron Pollard keeping him company, the pair’s end-overs offensive – including Pollard’s seven-ball 17 – capped off the innings that began with the second joint-lowest run tally in IPL history – of three runs – in the first two overs of the innings but ended with the joint-most – 45 runs – off the last two.Jason Behrendorff is pumped after taking a wicket•BCCIBehrendorff’s landfallAfter Mumbai’s win on Wednesday, Jason Behrendorff said, “My main strength is swinging the ball upfront and taking wickets.” If these were the standout features on Jason Behrendorff’s resume that earned him a contract in the January 2018 IPL auction, he delivered exactly that on his IPL debut, on a surface that had a little bit of bounce and seam.Completing his quota inside the first nine overs of the innings, he demonstrated why “hitting the top of the stumps was quite effective.”Behrendorff’s 2 for 22 saw him square up both right- and left-handers and put them in two minds with his steep bounce and away-going deliveries. With a Smart Economy of 3.00 to boast for the 12 Smart Runs he conceded, the left-arm quick, according to , elicited 32% false shots from the Super Kings batsmen, allowing them to attack only 24% deliveries.The rub of the green Behrendorff had in the form of that one-handed screamer by Pollard to dismiss Suresh Raina in the fifth over was in part down to his own execution of a “plan [we set] for that, knowing that he [Raina] likes to back away and he’ll look to go over the off side.” For a debutant who had dismissed Ambati Rayudu for a first-ball duck with a moving ball that rose delectably after hitting the deck, the Pollard stunner was a befitting bonus.Rapid, on fire, Hardik signs off with the ballIt hadn’t been three complete nights since Dhoni struck that match-winning 75 not out. Although the asking rate heading into the 15th over of Super Kings’ chase on Wednesday was 14, with Dhoni on 12 off 20 balls, the threat of yet another special at Wankhede was still alive.So when Hardik ambled in to deliver his third over, having conceded only six off his wicketless first two, there wasn’t anything particularly menacing about him. But that, and the course of the game, changed decidedly in the space of the next four balls. Eliciting a mistimed pull off Dhoni and having Ravindra Jadeja caught behind, Hardik lent an air of finality to Super Kings’ chase.As a result, Super Kings’ chances of winning fell drastically on ESPNcricinfo’s Forecaster tool, with the win probability dropping under 4%, despite Kedar Jadhav and Dwayne Bravo – the chief orchestrators of Super Kings’ miraculous one-run win in the 2018 season opener at the same venue – still at the crease.To sign off proceedings in what imminently appeared to be shaping up as Mumbai’s 100th IPL win, and their first at home this season, Hardik returned to dismiss Deepak to finish with figures of 3 for 20 to seal Mumbai’s 37-run win.

Jason Holder exerts his Bridgetown hold once more as England come a cropper

Career-best T20I figures continue remarkable run of success against England on home ground

Matt Roller22-Jan-2022It was Kieron Pollard who put it best: “When it comes to Kensington Oval and Jason Holder, he steps it up a bit. This is his ground.” It has become a familiar tale: West Indies beating England in Barbados, with Holder to the fore.Supporters in England who had tuned in on a Saturday night expecting an Ashes antidote were left with another dose of top-order turmoil. With Holder and Sheldon Cottrell sharing new-ball duties, England crumbled on a spicy pitch that caught them by surprise after they had warmed up on one which Jason Roy – who hit a 36-ball hundred – described as “massively flat”.The new ball moved a little in the air and off the seam, but the key factor was the variable bounce, which Holder used to his advantage by banging it in on a length and letting the pitch do the rest. He pitched the ball up in his first over, looking for early swing, before dragging his length back and beating Eoin Morgan time and again in the off-stump channel.He struck twice in two balls to remove Tom Banton, tentatively edging an outswinger to slip, and Moeen Ali, who poked a wide half-volley to backward point, but England struggled to lay a bat on him; according to ESPNcricinfo’s ball-by-ball data, they were in control of only seven balls in his three-over powerplay spell.”I think up front it had a little bit of swing,” Holder said at the interval. “Also, there was a bit of bounce as well. So for me it was just to hit the surface as much as possible and let the ball do the rest. Traditionally here at Kensington Oval, the bounce plays a big part.”Whenever you get the hard new ball in your hand you try to utilise it as much as possible when it comes to swing, and the ball did swing today up front,” he added. “It was just trying to use that first, and we felt that the ball held in the pitch a little bit so we tried to use the surface as much as possible. After it stopped swinging, the plan was to go into the wicket, hard, and that worked out for us today.”He came back to bowl a single over at the death, the 20th, which brought wickets in consecutive balls once more: Saqib Mahmood was caught in the deep, and Adil Rashid lost his leg stump while attempting to paddle-sweep. That meant career-best figures in this format for Holder, both at domestic and international level – a remarkable 4 for 7.Related

  • West Indies crashed and burned in the 2021 World Cup. How do they turn their T20I fortunes around?

  • Odean Smith models ambition 'to be one of the world's top allrounders' on idol Andre Russell

  • Kieron Pollard calls for patience as West Indies' T20 rebuild begins

  • Jason Holder and Brandon King condemn England to nine-wicket rout

Two years ago this week, Holder enjoyed his finest hour as Test captain, hitting a remarkable double-hundred on his home ground to set West Indies on their way to a 2-1 series win against England. It was one of three standout performances by Bajans in that match, along with Shane Dowrich’s hundred and Roston Chase’s eight-for, and the second of Holder’s three star turns against England at Kensington Oval, after five wickets in a 2015 Test and three more in an ODI later that year.It was fitting, then, that he was the star of Barbados’ first international match since it cut ties with the UK and became a republic in November. It was also the first time fans had attended a West Indies game on the island since the pandemic – albeit with a 50% capacity limit and mandatory proof of vaccination – and a statement to the selectors who made him a travelling reserve for the T20 World Cup. Perhaps unsurprisingly, those selectors have since been replaced.The timing was notable for another reason, too. The IPL auction is three weeks away, and Holder knows that performances like this will only serve to drive his price up. He has entered with a base price of 1.5 crore ($200,000 USD approx.) but with several seam-bowling allrounders missing from the long-list – including Sam Curran, Chris Woakes, Ben Stokes and the recently-retired Chris Morris – and several others retained in Andre Russell, Marcus Stoinis and Hardik Pandya, Holder’s skillset will be in greater demand than ever.He has enjoyed two impressive seasons in a row for Sunrisers Hyderabad, resuming his top-level T20 career after a break, and his versatility – he can bat in the middle overs or at the death, and is a bowling option across phases – should make him an attractive purchase. Back-of-a-length bowling is in vogue in T20 cricket, and while Holder may not have express pace, his height helps to create extra bounce.Holder was unexpectedly removed from the Test captaincy 10 months ago and admitted recently that he was still “transitioning” back into the ranks. “It was a little strange,” he told talkSPORT, “but it’s been a burden off my shoulders… I’m getting to the point where I’m understanding how to get back just playing.”He has always prioritised international cricket over leagues since being appointed as captain at 23, but after turning 30 at the end of last year, he has a short window in which to cash in. “It’s still something that I’ve like to do a bit more of,” he admitted. “Now that I’ve just crossed over an age category from my lovely 20s into the 30s, I feel as though I need to make hay while the sun shines.”Few would begrudge Holder from shifting his balance slightly, and cashing in while he can. Besides, a healthy payday at February’s auction might enable him to pay back whoever has been writing his scripts for him at his home ground.

Switch Hit: Roy-al rumble

England dropped Jason Roy from their final World Cup squad and called in Harry Brook. Alan, Miller and Vish sat down to discuss what it means for the defence of their title

Andrew Miller, Alan Gardner, Vithushan Ehantharajah19-Sep-2023England wrapped up a 3-1 series win over New Zealand but there was drama to come as the selectors made a late change to the World Cup squad, with Dawid Malan’s relentless form at opener leading to Jason Roy being left out in favour of Harry Brook as the spare batter. In this week’s pod, Alan Gardner is joined by Andrew Miller and Vithushan Ehantharajah to pick through the decision and assess how England’s World Cup defence is shaping up, as well as preview the Ireland series and discuss Leicestershire’s fairytale One-Day Cup win.

Fearless Kuldeep Yadav continues reaping rewards of planning and confidence

“He looks like he’s got energy, faster arm action and now he’s got the skill to take over,” Daniel Vettori on Kuldeep’s return to form

Sruthi Ravindranath29-Apr-20223:18

What is Kuldeep Yadav doing differently this season?

The renaissance continues: he has added new dimensions to his bowling, he has been more confident, and he has been producing match-winning spells. Kuldeep Yadav had wrecked his former team Kolkata Knight Riders earlier in the season, and on Thursday he did it again, finishing with superb figures of 4 for 14 in three overs to restrict them to 146.He continues to show why he deserves to be part of India’s T20 World Cup plans, putting his success down to him becoming “mentally strong” and having “clearer plans”.”I have probably become a better bowler [than before],” Kuldeep told host broadcaster Star Sports after the match. “However, one thing is certain that I have become a lot stronger mentally. When you fail in life, you think, ‘Where can I improve?’ You learn from your mistakes when you face failure in life. I have worked on it, and now I have no fear of failure.”Related

  • Shreyas Iyer: 'Need to go back and assess where we are going wrong'

  • Kuldeep stars with four-for to hand Capitals fourth win

  • The Kuldeep Yadav rennaissance continues

  • IPL 2022: Five players who have gone from being back-ups to certainties

Kuldeep picked up his second four-wicket haul of this season, taking his tally to 17 wickets. In his first over, he had debutant Baba Indrajith caught at long-on, before trapping Sunil Narine lbw with the very next ball. He came back in the 14th over to dismiss Shreyas Iyer and then set up Andre Russell to get him out for a three-ball duck.”I liked the wicket of Russell because I set him up well,” he said. “I first went around the wicket and then returned to bowl over the wicket. Then I went back to bowl around the wicket and bowled a bit wider. That was my plan. He played out two dots, and then I knew he would step out for a shot. So I perfectly planned for that, and it [the wicket] was an important wicket for us.”This kind of planning – without overthinking – is what has led to Kuldeep having his “best IPL season yet”. He was not too worried when he went wicketless while conceding 40 in three overs in the last match against Rajasthan Royals. But that has not always hasn’t been the case, he admitted.Until IPL 2019, Kuldeep was Knight Riders’ go-to wicket-taker, averaging 19.43 with an economy rate of 7.32. In 2020, he picked one wicket in five games and was eventually dropped. Kuldeep didn’t make the Knight Riders’ starting XI in the first half of the 2021 season either, and was then sidelined with a knee injury for the second.Kuldeep Yadav: “I’ve become a lot clearer with my plans. I’ve backed my skill”•BCCIWorrying about giving away too many runs is no longer an issue this time around because he has always found ways to come back.”I’m enjoying bowling, and I’ve become a lot clearer with my plans,” Kuldeep said. “I don’t think too much about what the batter will do, I have also given away some runs. I’ve backed my skill. I’ve stuck to my lengths too, though it’s not always been perfect.”But that’s what happens in T20. But my focus has been on bowling good lengths. When I get a wicket upfront then it just gives me more confidence [for the rest of the game].”But what is it that has sparked his turnaround this season?He has been bowling a lot quicker – his average speed has gone from 81.9kph in the IPL till 2021 to 86.6kph this season – and has also managed to put more revs on the ball. Former New Zealand captain Daniel Vettori believes these things have also helped Kuldeep bring more energy into his action.”More revs mean your hand position and your release point [are better] and the more energy you bring to the crease,” Vettori told ESPNcricinfo’s T20 Time:Out. “The great Shane Warne talked about how your energy at the crease shows how much spin you get in the ball – you need a quick arm speed, and then your subtleties and nuance come from your wrist position.””Looks like Kuldeep has got the energy, a faster arm action, and now he has got the skill to take over because of that base. It’s also the release point. It’s about bowling fast with more revolutions on it, and you see the seam position.”

“Kuldeep has recognised that to be successful in this format, ‘I too have to add a little bit of pace to the ball and be able to spin it'”Ian Bishop on Kuldeep’s success this season

“It felt like during the last opportunity he tried to buy wickets, and that maybe [was] a product of Narine being a certainty and [Varun] Chakravarthy coming into the team. ‘I have got to make the most of this opportunity because If I don’t do something, I’m going to be out of the team.'”Now he seems more settled – he is obviously the first choice for Delhi and he is forcing his case for being back in the Indian team. It’s all about what he’s done and how he’s improved as a bowler.”Former West Indies fast bowler Ian Bishop also believes that Kuldeep bringing in that extra dimension of adding pace has brought him success this season.”Virat Kohli, the captain [of India] at that time, wanted him [Yuzvendra Chahal] to bowl with more pace as wristspinners in world cricket have done. The Rashid Khans, the Imran Tahirs were bowling quicker through the air.”Kuldeep has recognised that in order to be successful in this format ‘I too have to add a little bit of pace to the ball and be able to spin it’. So whether that’s been a deliberate effort [or not], I think that was good planning. And to see him bowl with more pace is actually working.”Chahal and Kuldeep were once a crucial part of India’s white-ball plans before falling out of favour due to inconsistent performances. They both have now made strong cases: Chahal is the leading wicket-taker in the tournament, with Kuldeep right behind. But there is no competition between the two, at least according to the latter.”He is like my elder brother, and he has given me encouragement,” Kuldeep said. “He used to talk to me constantly even when I was injured. I sincerely wish that he got the Purple Cap.”

World Cup FAQs – Who are the favourites? Which games should you call in sick for?

Also, everything you needed to know about venues, reserve days, and… checks notes … boundary countbacks

Karthik Krishnaswamy29-Sep-2023A World Cup! That glorious celebration of a truly global sport, with 32 teams representing every region on the pla…
Er, no. Not that one. This is the men’s World Cup, featuring ten teams.Ah, right. That one. So ten teams, then? No room for the… what do you call them… Associates?
Well, no. Not entirely. There was, you see, a Qualifier, featuring a bunch of Associates plus the teams that finished outside the top eight of the World Cup Super League…The what?
It’s too complicated to explain here, but this should give you an idea. Anyway, it’s been scrapped now, or maybe not, but to get back to your previous question…Related

Will this be the last World Cup that is this big a deal?

How New Zealand all but took the 2019 World Cup title

From Andhra Pradesh to Auckland to Amsterdam – Teja Nidamanuru's journey to WC

Fans travelling for India-Pakistan game brace for logistical nightmare

Qualification pathway for 14-team 2027 ODI WC approved

Which was?
I’m not entirely sure, but I vaguely remember talking about the Qualifier? So it involved six Associate teams plus Sri Lanka, West Indies, Zimbabwe and Ireland. Ten teams in all, fighting for two World Cup spots.So who made it?
Sri Lanka and Netherlands.Netherlands?
Indeed. A weakened Netherlands team, that too, who did this to West Indies and this to Scotland in a gloriously improbable turn of events.And that means West Indies, two-time champions, are…
Yup, not at the World Cup for the first time ever.Brutal, eh? So where is this World Cup happening?
India. They have co-hosted it before, in 1987, 1996 and 2011. Now they are hosting the entire thing themselves.Netherlands grabbed a World Cup spot at the expense of two-time champions West Indies•ICC/Getty ImagesAll part of their grand plan to win it themselves, no doubt?
True, it has become a thing for host teams to win World Cups. India beat co-hosts Sri Lanka to win the 2011 final, then Australia beat co-hosts New Zealand in 2015, and four years later it was England’s turn to win by virtue of being hosts.Hey, that’s not fair. They also won by virtue of … *checks notes* … boundary count-back. Is that going to be a thing again?
Ah, no. Super Overs will decide tied games throughout the tournament, and if the Super Over is tied, they will just play another, and another, until they get an actual winner.Cue the final that never ends. Anyway, before we get that far, what’s the format of the tournament?
Just like 2019. Each of the ten teams plays every other team once in the league stage, and the top four go through to the semi-finals.Super Overs will decide tied games in the knockout stage, and if the Super Over is tied, they will just play another•Tom Jenkins/Getty ImagesWho are the favourites to get there?
India are hosts, and they are also the No. 1 ODI side in the ICC rankings. They have a team with almost every base covered, particularly in their home conditions. England may not have the same aura they went into the 2019 World Cup with, but they are defending champions, won a T20 World Cup last year, and remain the deepest and fastest-scoring batting line-up in ODIs. Then there is Pakistan, who held the No. 1 ranking until India took it from them – their top order and fast bowling are serious strengths, though they have weaknesses elsewhere.New Zealand were losing finalists at the last two ODI World Cups as well as the 2021 T20 World Cup. They have a core group of highly experienced, skilful players who will want to go one better this time. And you can expect Australia and South Africa, who recently tussled in an incredibly high-scoring five-match series, to be fiercely competitive at a world event.Won’t the conditions negate non-Asian teams’ strengths somewhat?
Possibly. Even though pitches at ICC white-ball events tend to be flat, spin could be hugely influential at least at some of the venues. Australia might find themselves seriously tested by Sri Lanka in Lucknow, for instance, and New Zealand by both Bangladesh and Afghanistan in Chennai. Afghanistan may also pose a big threat to Pakistan, who don’t really have a gun wicket-taking spinner, when they meet in Chennai.Where and when will the really high-profile contests take place?
Well, mostly in Ahmedabad. The biggest, highest-capacity, and most self-congratulatory venue in the world can’t stop hosting big games. The opening game on October 5, pitting 2019 finalists England and New Zealand, will be in Ahmedabad. So will Australia-England on November 4. And the final, of course, on November 19.Not to mention the small matter of India-Pakistan on October 14.Ahmedabad will host several big-ticket games, including the final on November 19•AFP/Getty ImagesIndia-Pakistan! I to be in Ahmedabad for it.
Lol.Okay, what other big games should I call in sick for?
India and Australia have played some cracking games in Chennai, including a thriller during the 1987 World Cup. They meet again in Chennai, on October 8, to open their respective campaigns. England and South Africa are among the most power-packed batting line-ups in the tournament, and their meeting at the Wankhede Stadium on October 21 should be full of runs. There could be a bit of help for fast bowlers in Dharamsala, where Australia meet New Zealand on October 28. The two best ODI teams of the last two World Cup cycles, India and England, face off in Lucknow on October 29, and then there is the rivalry to end all rivalries, the derby, on November 6 in Delhi.Right. So at what time do these matches begin?
There will be six day games, starting 10.30am IST (0500 GMT), but every other match will be day-night contests, starting at 2pm IST (0830 GMT).Are there reserve days in case of rain?
Yup, there will be reserve days for both semi-finals – which are scheduled to take place in Mumbai and Kolkata on November 15 and 16 – and the final.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus